edcforums

First Look: Tasmanian Tiger Basepack 52

Forums Forums Gear – The Stuff We Carry Gear Reviews First Look: Tasmanian Tiger Basepack 52

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4109
    admin
    Keymaster

    Or: The (better) Raid Pack MK IV?

    It doesn’t always have to be the heavy-duty monster, even I’ve realized that. Even if I find the Mil OPS 80 pack insanely well done, over 4 kilos empty weight is a statement.
    If you can get by with less volume, then the Basepack 52 can be a very modular, convenient and lighter alternative.
    For a good six weeks I have had the pack with me on my hikes in Brandenburg, Germany, my impressions I may present to you below.

    First, the roll-top backpack is sexy. There is nothing worse for me than an “ugly” backpack. Pilots say “if a plane looks good, it flies well”. Form follows function, or something like that.

    Since there’s no arguing about taste, as we all know, make up your own minds:
    [?IMG]

    [?IMG]

    [?IMG]

    [?IMG]

    [?IMG]

    Where the Mil OPS 80+24 can hardly run on features, the Basepack comes across as rather plain. A classic military backpack, original molle, no laser cut.

    The technical frame data reads like this:

    Dimensions: 74 x 31 x 23 cm
    Volume: 52 l, expandable to 65 l
    Weight: 2,67 kg
    Back system: V2 Plus system
    Material: CORDURA® 700 den, T-Square Rip FD

    V2 Plus back system
    Subdivision into main compartment and bottom compartment
    Hiking pole/ice axe holder
    Height adjustable chest strap
    Removable, padded hip belt
    Side compression straps
    Circumferential bottom compression
    Lid with gear loops
    Height adjustable, removable lid
    Hydration system preparation

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.